Also known as The Lost Levels.
RELEASE DATE: June 1986
Busta Rhymes once asked, “Are you prepared?” Small pause. “I hope you are prepared.” I can’t think of more perfect words to begin this review. If you aren’t prepared for the abrasive difficulty found within Super Mario Bros. 2…well, I hope you are prepared. But wait, Super Mario Bros. 2? The Mario game where you can play as Luigi, Peach, or Toad? Sorry cupcake, that particular Mario Bros. 2 – as familiar to you as your favorite childhood stuffed animal – is a sham. The American version of SMB2 is a re-working of a game called Doki Doki Panic. The game I’m talking about – the game you need to be prepared for – is the real Super Mario Bros. 2, otherwise known by the Western half of the world as The Lost Levels, or that game on Super Mario All-Stars that nobody played.
If the original Super Mario Bros. was a refreshing cocktail, then Super Mario Bros. 2 is a series of strong shots, each more fiery than the last. The game follows SMB1‘s template almost to the tee: Princess has been captured, so you gotta rescue her. Eight worlds with four stages each (or so you initially think), loads of running, jumping, spitting fireballs at Goombas. But just as you’re settling into a stone-cold groove in the first level, you find the Poison Mushroom, ingest it, and shrink back down to tiny Mario. That shouldn’t have happened, you think. Mushrooms are supposed to be good. Your logic is spot-on, but the game’s logic has been altered.
Super Mario Bros. 2, unlike the first game, is against you. Within the first couple worlds, you discover windstorms. They blow either right or left and can change directions in an instant. Often you’ll be asked to jump into the windstorm to reach the next platform. Given their bi-polar tendencies to change directions, this can get tricky. Like in SMB, there are warp zones within the game. Two of the warp zones you’ll find will send you back to world 1. Yup, backwards warp zones. So many swears. Also, to truly “beat” the game, you have to beat it eight times in a row to unlock Worlds A-D. World 9 will also appear if you refrained from using warps during the game. Thankfully, in the All-Stars re-release, you only had to beat the game once to access these stages. My lands, Nintendo, what were you thinking? What raises my particular bile are the jumps SMB2 asks you to make. Many of them seem impossible, especially with all the chaotic wind and enemies surrounding you while you’re trying to make them. Take heart. If you have the gumption, you can beat Super Mario Bros. 2. It might make you pass out when you’re done, but what stories you’ll have!
Super Mario Bros. 2 is difficult, no question, but does it cross the line? I meet a lot of gamers who write it off as “too hard.” Not just your typical run-of-the-mill gamer weaned on contemporary hold-your-hand game design either, but authentic retro warriors who have soldiered through Battletoads, Bionic Commando, and Ghosts ‘n Goblins, among other masochistic field trips. “Too hard? Compared to those games?” I ask. “No way. And you know how I know? Because I’ve beaten Super Mario Bros. 2. It can’t be that hard.” Surely there’s another reason why gamers just aren’t fans of the game. But when I ask why people don’t care for Lost Levels, I don’t receive clear answers. “It’s not as good as the American Mario Bros. 2,” “The game asks too much from the player,” and “I don’t know, man, it’s just too hard” are my top 3 responses – all of which are actually half-answers, at best. I have two theories, though, as to why SMB2 is held with such ambivalence or even disdain. They are as follows:
#1: By the time America received SMB2/The Lost Levels, we had already played four Mario masterpieces – the original, Doki Doki Panic Mario Edition, Super Mario Bros. 3, and Super Mario World. All well-received by gamers and critics, all rightfully so. Each Mario game has its own style, its own brand of whimsy and wonder. They were challenging at times, but mostly, they were just well-designed games meant to appeal to millions of people. Each one of them did their job, to varying degrees of success. The Lost Levels was a unique creature, a Japanese-only sequel to Super Mario Bros. that looked kinda like Super Mario Bros. and played kinda like it, but brother, it was tough. It didn’t invite the player in for tea and biscuits. It demanded your full attention, and if you couldn’t take the aggression, suck on a poison mushroom. Lost Levels made no apologies.
#2: Gamers love the American Super Mario Bros. 2 – a lot. As far as they’re concerned, The Lost Levels is a pretender to the throne. How dare it show its face five years and claim to be the “rightful” sequel. I believe, in most gamers’ minds, there can be only one Super Mario Bros. 2. Many of them made their decision long before they even knew of The Lost Levels‘ existence.
I understand the perspectives of gamers who don’t enjoy Super Mario Bros. 2, but I completely disagree with them. Sure, the level design isn’t as fluid or memorable as the original game, but who cares? Nintendo of Japan designed the game for those who had already conquered Super Mario Bros. a thousand times over. Nintendo of America made the right decision to bypass SMB2 for a re-worked Doki Doki Panic, but I believe both the American and Japanese versions deserve respect on their own terms; if only because they highlight the remarkable creativity on display at Nintendo during those days. Super Mario Bros. 2 is not the Mario we’re used to playing, and I adore it for this reason.
Latest posts by Dylan Cornelius (see all)
- By Request – New Ghostbusters II - April 4, 2014
- The 86 Worst NES Games – Part 4 - April 1, 2014
- The 86 Worst NES Games – Part 3 - March 29, 2014
14 replies on “Super Mario Bros. 2 (JP)”
New comment system? My prayers are answered!
I may have missed it, but I didn't see a mention of the extra lives in SMB for jumping on koopas. I mastered that, though one time I got too many lives and the game ended.
As for SMB2, I never gave it a fair shake. I think it was hard to go back to after seeing SMB3 and Super Mario World, especially since I'm not that great of a platformer. Difficult Japanese games often didn't see America, or they were made much easier. Final Fantasy IV, for example. The American version is a cakewalk, while the Japanese version is legitimately hard, which is rare for any RPG.
In my personal opinion, The Lost Levels was not a good game. It was the equivalent of an official Mario hack. Miyamoto didn't work on it, because he was too busy working on good games like Zelda and “our” SMB2, Doki Doki Panic. I think, at the end of the day, Nintendo/Miyamoto decided to give us the SMB2 we got, because quite frankly, it was just the much better game. It was more worthwhile for them to spend the time and resources to refurbish Doki as a Mario title, than it was to ship us a sequel that would have sold, but is honestly under par. It's biggest claim to fame is that Luigi handles differently, and that the game itself is fucked beyond belief.
I don't hate, it, but I'm also not a fan. I am perfectly content, even happy, with the SMB2 we got.
Nintendo of America thought the game was frustratingly difficult, thus they asked for something different. I agree, I think America got the right game at the right time, but I'm glad Lost Levels came out at all. I don't see it as a traditional NES Mario game, but for what it is – a new set of challenges based on the original – I thoroughly enjoy it. To each his own!
More levels for those who've played Super Mario Bros. extensively and wants more. Not a bad thing.
Never finished it eight times in a row, however.
No sane person would want to finish it eight times in a row, I don't think.
Real sane people pass away from this game, Dylan. 🙂
They don't even play it! SMB1 is too hard for them.
“Super Mario Bros. Deluxe” for GBC contains a most orthodox version called “Super Mario Bros. for Super Players”.
You don't have to finish it eight times in a row, thankfully. The disc saves how many times you've beaten level 8 by adding a star to the title screen.
I'm pretty sure it was Rudy Ray Moore/Dolemite who asked “are you prepared”.
Don't care for this game, just seems like a hack of the first one. A sequel shouldn't just be the same game, only harder.
I think a lot of people have asked that, but my favorite rendition is Busta Rhymes.
My first exposure to this game was, of course, through Super Mario All-Stars. With the updated graphics and everything, it seemed like a brand-new game and it wasn't until years later that I learned it was actually the original Super Mario Bros. 2. It's quite funny, really, that playing the NES version feels like you're simply playing a rom-hack, but playing the SNES version feels like a new game. At least to me.
The game has its merits, but I couldn't see myself playing the NES version. The ridiculous “complete the game 8 times over” is overkill and I felt the SNES version got it just right with the save system.
Yeah, agreed. The NES version does feel like more of a rom-hack.
Super Mario Bros is my favorite guy, Sonic the Hedgehog the same!
Hey yo! Where can this be found???
I managed to beat the All Stars version. Good game, but pretty damn intense. It can’t be that hard though – I can’t get past the first level of several other apparently lesser challenges like Contra, Dracula’s Curse, any of the Makaimura games…