Remember when 2010 seemed far away?
RELEASE DATE: September 1990
Street Fighter 2010: The Final Fight has nothing to do with either of those storied Capcom franchises. It could have been called Robo Generica for all of its relationship to Street Fighter. The former is a more apt title, but it wouldn’t have done the game any favors from either critical or sales standpoints. Believe it or not, the first Street Fighter actually performed decently in the States (2010 was released one year prior to Street Fighter II), thus linking 2010 –a difficult sci-fi action title that would be hard to sell on its own merits – with Street Fighter was a way to boost sales, if only initially. Nobody was fooled, and the game was forced to sell on its own merits anyway. Street Fighter II came out a year later, and Capcom never bothered with an alternate Street Fighter timeline again.
Yes, Street Fighter 2010‘s name taints it slightly, but this shouldn’t be the case. It’s a distinct action/brawler that implements unique ideas into a relatively stale genre. You play as “Ken,” a flexible cyborg cop who can shoot lasers out of his four limbs. Most levels are like boss stages, in that, you focus your firepower on one large enemy. Once the enemy is destroyed, you collect his life force and jump quickly into a portal; failure to jump in the portal before your time runs out results in death. Interspersed between these boss battles are more traditional platforming stages and stages that have you fighting a few enemies, but the goal is always to collect enough enemy life force to open a portal.
Make no mistake, Street Fighter 2010 is Capcom-brand tough. Ken doesn’t always control with the grace and elegance that a flexible robot should. Yes, he can hang from ceilings, and grasp onto walls and poles, but he can’t shoot diagonally very well. Since most of the enemies attack diagonally, it can be cumbersome trying to align Ken’s line of sight with his target. The level design too is curiously complex. Most of the “boss” stages take place in one large room, but the rooms have no set design pattern. Poles, crates, and random sci-fi crap is strewn about through each room. This is probably so the player will utilize Ken’s flexible movements more frequently and not just stand and shoot the boss. Regardless, most levels are visually disorienting, a feature you never want in a game. Lastly, Ken has several hit points, but they don’t refill at the end of each stage. The game is divided up into several stages per area, and only after you beat the entire area does his life refill. Yes, you can find some energy along the way, but the bosses are pretty dad blame difficult. A bone, Capcom. That’s all we, as players, ask for.
Thanks to its jarring stop-and-go level structure and complex controls, Street Fighter 2010 has an odd, engaging feel, unlike any action game you’ll play on the NES. If you can withstand some punishing difficulty (even by Capcom standards) and overlook its silly moniker, it will surprise you, even as you’re cursing its name.
Latest posts by Dylan Cornelius (see all)
- By Request – New Ghostbusters II - April 4, 2014
- The 86 Worst NES Games – Part 4 - April 1, 2014
- The 86 Worst NES Games – Part 3 - March 29, 2014
4 replies on “#614 – Street Fighter 2010: The Final Fight”
Similar thoughts here. Very intriguing game, but so damn hard I lost interest after a while.
It’s not a bad game. Not totally. But it sure as hell was one of the biggest disappointments of my childhood.
That was a cheap move Capcom, banking on the Street Fighter name just to fool kids into buying this thing…….bad form.
@Jesse: Totally agree.
It was a good game, I loved it and I still sometimes play it. The title is misleading, but, the game itself is pretty good. Good review!